I need to make an original research paper.
This is what I found on the source “Cardoso and Faletto’s “Dependency and development in Latin America” – A Bolivian Perspective” (I am going to upload this paper):
““Dependence is dead, long live dependence and the class struggle” thus the title of an article by the dependency theorist André Gunder Frank, published in 1974 in Latin American Perspectives. Indeed, it has
often been stated that dependency theory has lost its significance in explaining underdevelopment and has thus been “relegated to footnote status in the field of development studies”1. Yet, in recent years, a lot
of scholars have attempted to refute this statement, claiming that dependency theory still has its use in development studies, even though they have identified a number of flaws.
Emerging in parallel with other development theories in the 1950s, dependency theory mainly focuses on Latin America, the most important authors being Prebisch, Furtado, dos Santos, Frank and finally
Cardoso and Faletto, whose theory this paper concentrates on. Most of the different approaches within dependency theory share several Marxist core assumptions, such as the construction of base (means
and relations of production) and superstructure (the political, cultural and social consequences of these means and relations of production). On the international level, all politics, whether external or domestic,
takes place within the framework of the capitalist world economy which determines the behavior of actors as well as patterns of interaction between them.
(This last part is basically my thesis, but the sources do not have to be the same?)
In this paper, the question of whether dependency theory as presented by Fernando Henrique Cardoso and Enzo Faletto is still useful in explaining underdevelopment will be examined considering as example
the events occurring in a typical example of an underdeveloped Latin American economy – Bolivia. The recent election of the left-wing populist Evo Morales potentially represents a paradigm shift for one of
the poorest Latin American countries – a shift away from the neoliberal ideology towards a still capitalist regime with a socialist flavor to it (if one is to believe the declarations of Morales’s vice president Alvaro
García Linera). Applying Cardoso and Faletto’s approach to the case of Bolivia reveals its strengths, but also some methodological as well as textual weaknesses. In order to show this, the first section will
present their theory as exhibited in their publication Dependency and Development in Latin America and in an article published by Cardoso in the New Left Review in 1972. The second section focuses on the
events in Bolivia, pointing at strong and weak points of the approach. Section four concludes.”
I need to analyze to applicability of Cardoso’s and Falleto’s Depedency theory in the case of Bolivia that is now shifting from neo-liberalism into pluri-nationalism.
Feel free to use the paper I am uploading as it provides basically most of what I need. And other academic ones. I would suggest to make a very similar paper to the one I am uploading in 5 pages but that it
looks original, that paper also has more sources at the end that might be useful. Please focus more on the applicability part and not on the historical background of the country as I might expand on that myself,
unless you find it really necessary.
If you can use this paper as source (if you have access to databases or can get it) it would be great, if not I understand:
Costoya, Manuel. Latin American Post- Neoliberal Development Thinking: The Bolivian ‘Turn’
Toward Suma Qamana.” European Jouranl of Development Research 25. Apr 2013. Web
Some really weak sources I have collected, please use only 1 or 2 of these ONLY IF REALLY USEFULL or find whatever you see its more apropiate:
http://www1.tau.ac.il/eial/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=507&Itemid=216
http://www.princeton.edu/~kohli/SCIDCardosoPaper_text.pdf
http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/4/1/2158244014523790
http://www.cipamericas.org/archives/937
Anton, Nora. “Cardoso and Faletto’s “Dependency and development in Latin America” – A
Bolivian Perspective.” Center for Europan Studies – University of Twente. 2006. Web
Costoya, Manuel. Latin American Post- Neoliberal Development Thinking: The Bolivian ‘Turn’
Toward Suma Qamana.” European Jouranl of Development Research 25. Apr 2013. Web
Untoja, Fernando. “Retorno al Ayllu: Una Mirada Aymara a la Globalizacion – Critica a la Economía
Comunitaria. Educiones Ayra. Apr 2012. Print
Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia – Ministerio de Planificacion de Desarrollo. Plan Nacional de
Desarrollo, 2011-2014. Web.
I will also upload the original Cardoso and Falleto Dependecy Theory in Latin America just in case you see it usefull.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more