As a matter of etiquette, what different terminology did different lawyers use to address the presiding judicial officer and each other Custom Essay

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”hp2″]

1) As a matter of etiquette, what different terminology did different lawyers use to address the presiding judicial officer and each other
2) from your viewpoint at the back of the court, can you establish which party stands on the right side and which one on the left sides? how do you explain what happen when only one party attends?
3) Briefly describe some of the different aspects of courtroom etiquette that you observe, (behaviour attending solicitors/barristers towards each other and at the bench and vice versa, order of matters being heard, discussion between counsel before the court was in session vs during session etc)
4) Discuss two or three of the commital mentions you saw, what offences were involved, what orders were sought each of the parties and what the magistrates in fact ordered. was bail mentioned in these matters?
5) Explain the nature of the offence in the trial you observed and the evidence the prosecution lead to prove its case and any defence raised by the accused, as best you can (you might only be able to relate some of these details due to the length of the trial)

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”hp4″]