Assuming that radical egalitarianism is not a defensible position, (1) which one or combination of the following criteria do you thing should be used for just departures from strict equality; accomplishments, effort, ability, and need? Custom Essay

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”hp2″]

Topic #1: Assuming that radical egalitarianism is not a defensible position, (1) which one or combination of the following criteria do you thing should be used for just departures from strict equality; accomplishments, effort, ability, and need? (2) Note the strengths and weakness of each, and defend your choice of criterion or criteria.

Topic #2: what is Edmund Burke’s position on social justice, and (2) what is his defense of his theory of justice/ (3) what criticisms might be raised against the theory/ (4) How does this theory clarify the problem of the “natural lottery” (a phrase introduced by John Rawl’s) (5) What is your position on Burke’s theory of justice? Defend it.

Topic #3: Present the design argument for the existence of God using either Aquinas’s 5th argument (2)why does Darwin’s theory of evolution appear to undermine the design argument (3) Discuss one of the ways (and only one) of redoing the design argument to address the Darwinian challenge/ do you think this reworking of the design argument is successful? Defend your position

Topic #4: Describe Hobbes’ “state of nature” (2) what kind of a concept is this–historical, empirical, anthropological, a mental experiment, analytic (logical)/ Explain. (3) How can, according to Hobbes, humans overcome this state of nature/ (4) what kind of a government is needed to create a “civilized society”/ (5) Offer a brief critical evaluation of Hobbes; state of nature and his proposal for over coming it.

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”hp4”]