Kant’s & Mill’s: One will be a sort of “book report,” and the other will be your “reasoned reflections” on what you are reporting on Custom Essay

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”hp2″]

There will be two parts to the Midterm Exam. The Essay part of the Exam will consist of two elements. One will be a sort of “book report,” and the other will be your “reasoned reflections” on what you are reporting on. On the “book report” part of your Essay you will be graded on how well you demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of the details of Kant’s and Mill’s theories. For grading purposes the main emphasis will be on the “book report” part, where you demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of the material, e.g., by explaining important terms and phrases which denote various elements of the theories, like the “Cat. Imp;” the “Prin. of Utility,” or “Greatest Happiness Prin.;“ “good will,” etc. On your evaluation of the material, or the “reasoned reflections” part you will be graded on whether or not you give reasons in support of your conclusions, i.e., whether you are giving “arguments,” or not. To give arguments is all that is required. Say whatever you actually think. Just add your real reasons for thinking it. So as long as you are giving “arguments” you will get a good grade for the “reasoned reflections” part.
Now here’s the “catch“–you must give non-fallacious reasons in support of your conclusions. It is not always easy to critique the views of a philosopher well, neither artificially strengthening, nor weakening them, in accord with the “Prin. Of Charity.” They take study and intellectual effort to understand. Avoiding giving fallacious critiques in Ethics and ,e.g., in Philosophy of Religion, areas of reflection where our own views may be passionately held, can be particularly challenging. Common Fallacies to avoid:
1) Straw Man Fallacy (opposite “Prin. Of Charity“) Examples–(a)”Kant maintains that people should not think for themselves, so he is wrong about X.”
(b)“Kant claims that we should do whatever he says just because it is “right,” so he is wrong about X.”
2) Argumentum ad Hominem (“argument directed at the person“)
Example- “Abusive“–”Kant was a romance starved prude, so he was wrong about X.“
Examples-“Circumstantial“–(a) “Kant was never married, so he was wrong about X.”
(b) “Kant lived in a different place and time, so he was wrong about X.” (c)“Kant was a Christian, so he was wrong about X.”
3) Argumentum ad Populum (“bandwagon argument”)
Examples-(a)“Kant is traditionally regarded as a great thinker, so he was right about X.” (b)“Kant’s ‘Categorical Imperative’ is related to the widespread principle of the Golden Rule, so he was right about X.” (c )“Kant was a Christian, so he was right about X.”
4) Argumentum ad Ignorantium (“argument from ignorance”)
Ex.-”No one can prove all their moral views are correct, so Kant was wrong about X.”
Kant could be correct or incorrect about any number of things, but the reasons for this are not given above. Naturally, we could commit the same kinds of fallacies regarding Mill. It is easier to “criticize” than to give a reasoned critique. To sum up–I am not saying that you should not say whatever you actually think. I am saying that you need to demonstrate that you have non-fallacious reasons to think it. This is part of critical thinking. If you do not have such reasons, then perhaps you should consider changing your mind. Try to avoid “rhetorical questions” as well. There are two reasons for this:
1) It is assumed that the reader gets the point of the question, which is not necessarily true.(2) It is assumed that the answer “goes w/o saying,” which is not necessarily true.

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”hp4″]

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more