To what extent does Anglo-America depend on the organisation of national state power Custom Essay

I need essay to be not like an essay suggesting just information or other description, but analytically researched .
Essay should to be clearly answered for the question, with good support examples for each statement.
I have module guide where you may find the relevant list of literature.
Even it will mostly be based on second data sources I’d like to have more alternative sources being included.
So, the essay should be focused on analytical points, examples, evidences making strong your arguments.
Also the essay should be well structured.

POLI 60292
BUSINESS AND POLITICS UNDER
ADVANCED CAPITALISM

Dr. Ian Bruff
Room: 4.015 (Arthur Lewis Building)
Tel. 0161 306 8032
ian.bruff@manchester.ac.uk

Office hours: via SOHOL

Thursday, 0900-1100
Room: 4.210 University Place

Credit rating: 15

Table of Contents

Contact details

1
Course credit rating

1
Course rationale

2
Course aims

2
Learning outcomes

2
Course organisation and schedule

2
Course assessment

3
Recommended texts

4
Journals and other sources

5
Seminar topics and reading lists

7
The scholarly apparatus of bibliography and referencing 15

The University’s Academic Standards Code of Practice specifies that a 15 credit course is expected to require about 150 hours work by students.

This course is normally offered in our programme specializing in International Political Economy but is available as an option across most programmes.

This interdisciplinary module is suitable for students with a prior knowledge of a range of social science fields: for example, International and Comparative Political Economy, comparative politics, globalisation,

development studies, social policy, and social/political theory. This also means that students with a limited knowledge will not be at a disadvantage. There are no pre-requisites for taking the course.

Course rationale

This module introduces students to the literatures and debates on business power in contemporary capitalism. Through doing so, it initially familiarises students with the classic theories of business power, which

tended to take the national ‘container’ as the unit of analysis. Moreover, the underlying assumption was that business power is always organised in conjunction with state power and union power in specific

national settings. However, the transnationalisation of business over the past few decades has raised new conceptual questions and analytical challenges. Therefore, the module’s consideration of classic case

studies – Anglo-America, Western Europe, and East Asia – will be infused with an awareness of what has changed in these areas of the world. International institutions will also a topic for discussion, as will the

possibilities for resisting the rise of global business power plus the contemporary context of global crisis.

The module’s combination of broader themes with specific case studies enables it to speak to a range of crucial political issues, such as the autonomy of national polities in the contemporary era, the

implications for democracy of the transnationalisation of business power, and the position of trade unions and social movements in contemporary capitalism.

Course aims

The course aims to:

• Enhance understanding of the literatures on business power
• Identify and discuss the classic case studies
• Consider the implications of the transnationalisation of business
• Assist students in improving their oral and written communication skills

Learning outcomes

On completion of this unit, successful students will be able to:

• Critically reflect on the merits and limitations of classic literatures on business power
• Interrogate the specificities of classic case studies, and what has changed in them
• Relate the above to the transnationalisation of business and the current context of global crisis
• Pursue independent study and learning, and the improvement of oral and written analytical skills

Course organisation and schedule

The course will be delivered weekly, and through a mixture of lectures and seminars. Following an introductory session, we meet for seven two-hour sessions. Everyone will be expected to have done some

reading prior to the session and to contribute fully to discussions. Attendance is compulsory. If you know in advance that circumstances beyond your control will prevent you from attending, you should contact

me as soon as possible to explain your absence.

Week 1 (30 January)
Introductory meeting: short lecture on business and politics in capitalism, presentation of the module’s objectives and organisation of seminars

Week 2 (introductory lectures with time for discussion) (6 February)
a) Classic theories of business power
b) Challenges to the classic theories

Week 3 (seminar) (13 February)
Anglo-America

Week 4 (seminar) (20 February)
Europe

Week 5 (seminar) (27 February)
East Asia

Week 6 (seminar) (6 March)
Global business power

Week 7 (seminar) (13 March)
Resisting global business power

Week 8 (seminar) (20 March)
Business power in times of crisis

Course assessment

Course assessment will be broken down as follows:

• A written essay of 3500 words in length (80% of the mark)
• A seminar presentation of 15 minutes in length (20% of the mark)

Please note that it is not possible for your essay and your presentation to cover the same topic. Please feel free to speak to me if you have any queries about this.

The deadline for submission of the essay is 1500 on Tuesday 6 May 2014. Essays are to be submitted via Turnitin. The essay must be typed (double-spaced). Extensions will only be granted by your MA

Director or MA Administrator – contact Amanda Bridgeman in the first instance. Full details regarding extensions can be found in your programme handbook or in the case of students from other Discipline

Areas from the Graduate Office.

Plagiarism is a serious offence. Students should consult the University’s statement on plagiarism, which can be either found in their programme handbooks or Taught Masters and Postgraduate Diploma Student

Guide which is distributed during registration (or obtained from the Graduate Office).

A lack of a proper bibliography and appropriate references will be penalised by the deduction of marks. Essays must not be faxed or e-mailed to the Graduate Office or to a member of staff. No assessed

essay sent in this way will be marked.

ESSAY TITLES

1). How useful is a national methodology for the study of business power in the contemporary era?

2). To what extent does Anglo-America depend on the organisation of national state power?

3). How far is it possible to now talk of a continent-wide European economic space?

4). Does business or the state have the upper hand in East Asian capitalisms?

5). Do international institutions have the capacity to create a ‘level playing field’ for business across the globe?

6). To what extent is it possible to challenge the rise of global business power?

PRESENTATION TIPS

All presentations must be accompanied by a handout for the class of no more than one page – please do not simply give us some text, though. Use the handout intelligently, in order to direct our attention to

certain key themes. Additionally, all presentations must use PowerPoint slides. All presentations are to be approximately 15 minutes in length: this means you cannot cover everything on the topic, so make

informed choices on what to discuss.

Think about:

Research question Make sure you focus on what you have been asked to cover
Content The relevance and clarity of your discussion
Structure The organisation and coherence of the presentation
Presentation Use of voice and pace of the discussion
Discussion The quality of the discussion and the interest provoked

General tips:
PowerPoint Use the animation option to bring up the bullet points one at a time
Notes Don’t look down at them too often – the less often the better!
Timing Better to stick to your time limit than exceed it in order to say more
Pace Make sure you are not speaking too quickly due to being nervous
Conclusion/Discussion Direct the discussion in the way you wish through the conclusion plus your interventions in the discussion

Recommended texts

Many of the classic publications (i.e. those which cover a wide range of country examples) are rooted in the methodologically nationalist approach noted above. Therefore, the below monographs should not

be seen as essential reading. Nevertheless, they are excellent reference books and contain some noteworthy arguments, especially with regard to the historical trajectory of different countries (which means that

they are often part of the reading list for various weeks). In addition, they help provide a historical context to how these debates emerged, and inform how recent publications, even if global in orientation,

enquire into the topic. As such, they are still highly recommended.

Coates, D. (2000) Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era. Cambridge: Polity.
Crouch, C. and Streeck, W. (eds) (1997) Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity. London: Sage.
Hart, J.A. (1992) Rival Capitalists: International Competitiveness in the United States, Japan, and Western Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lindblom, C.E. (1977) Politics and Markets: The World’s Political-economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.
Morgan, G., Whitley, R. and Moen, E. (eds) (2005) Changing Capitalisms? Internationalism, Institutional Change, and Systems of Economic Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scott, J. (1997) Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vogel, S.K. (1996) Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Weiss, L. (1998) The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity.
Weiss, L. (ed.) (2003) States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, G.K (2003) Business and Politics: A Comparative Introduction (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Journals and other sources

The reading list provided for each seminar is by no means an exhaustive list of all relevant books and articles. You are encouraged to make full use of the library resources. In particular, it is important that you

check recent issues of the key journals. Please also remember that numerous journals are of relevance for this module, so feel free to use whichever articles you find most relevant for your study – they do not

need to be in the below journals (some of which will be in the citations for the readings in each week).

Antipode
British Journal of Industrial Relations
British Journal of Politics & International Relations
Business and Politics
Cambridge Journal of Economics
Capital & Class
Comparative European Politics
Competition and Change
Critical Asian Studies
Critical Social Policy
Critical Sociology
Debatte
Development and Change
Economy and Society
European Journal of Industrial Relations
Global Networks
Globalizations
Governance
Historical Materialism
Interface
International Sociology
Journal of Contemporary Asia
Journal of Common Market Studies
Journal of European Public Policy
Journal of Social Policy
New Left Review
New Political Economy
New Political Science
Pacific Review
Pacifica Review
Political Geography
Politics & Society
Regulation & Governance
Review of International Political Economy
Social Movement Studies
Socio-economic Review
Third World Quarterly
West European Politics

In addition, consider consulting periodicals such as the Financial Times, the New Internationalist and The Economist.

Seminar topics and reading lists

1. Introduction and administration (30 January)

Please note that there are two categories of reading for each seminar. Required Reading is the minimum reading for all students prior to each seminar. Further Reading indicates supplementary reading for each

given topic area, which is useful for both the seminars and for preparation for the assessed essay.

Please note that I expect you to read at least three different texts per week.

Topics addressed:
• Presentation of the module’s objectives
• Getting to know the group
• Teaching strategies
• Organisation of seminar presentations

2. Classic theories of business power and challenges to the classic theories (6 February)

Topics addressed:
• What we mean by business power
• Business power from a methodologically nationalist perspective
• Challenges to methodological nationalism, and implications

Required reading

Moran, M. (2009) Business, Politics, and Society: An Anglo-American Comparison. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapter 1.
Zysman, J. (1996) ‘The Myth of a “Global” Economy: Enduring National Foundations and Emerging Regional Realities’. New Political Economy, 1:2, 157-84.

Further reading

Barley, S.R. (2007) ‘Corporations, Democracy, and the Public Good’. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16:3, 201-15.
Bieler, A. (2006) The Struggle for a Social Europe: Trade Unions and EMU in Times of Global Restructuring. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Chapters 3 and 4.
Crouch, C. and Streeck, W. (eds) (1997) Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity. London: Sage. Introduction and Chapter 11.
Hart, J.A. (1992) Rival Capitalists: International Competitiveness in the United States, Japan, and Western Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Chapter 1.
Howell, C. (forthcoming) ‘The Changing Relationship between Labor and State in Contemporary Capitalism’. Law, Culture and the Humanities, Online First section.
Lindblom, C.E. (1977) Politics and Markets: The World’s Political-economic Systems. New York: Basic Books. Chapter 13.
Morgan, G., Whitley, R. and Moen, E. (eds) (2005) Changing Capitalisms? Internationalism, Institutional Change, and Systems of Economic Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapter 1.
Pontusson, J. (2005) ‘Varieties and Commonalities of Capitalism’ in Coates, D. (ed.) Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 163-88.
Scott, J. (1997) Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapters 1-3.
Thatcher, M. (2007) Internationalisation and Economic Institutions: Comparing European Experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Especially the Introduction and Chapter 1.
Vogel, S.K. (1996) Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Chapters 1, 10 and 11.
Weiss, L. (1998) The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity. Chapter 1.
Wilson, G.K. (2003) Business and Politics: A Comparative Introduction (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Chapter 1.

3. Anglo-America (13 February)

Presentation questions

1). How much power does business exercise in the UK?
2). How much power does business exercise in the US?
3). How has Anglo-American capitalism evolved in recent years?

Required reading

Moran, M. (2009) Business, Politics, and Society: An Anglo-American Comparison. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapters 2 and 6.

Further reading

Barley, S.R. (2010) ‘Building an Institutional Field to Corral a Government: A Case to Set an Agenda for Organization Studies’. Organization Studies, 31:6, 777-805.
Block, F. (2008) ‘Swimming Against the Current: The Rise of a Hidden Developmental State in the United States’. Politics & Society, 36:2, 169-206.
Coates, D. (2000) Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era. Cambridge: Polity. Especially pages 23-52 and 86-94.
Corry, D. (2010) ‘Labour and the Economy, 1997-2010: More than a Faustian Pact’. Political Quarterly, 81:S1, 123-39.
Crouch, C. and Streeck, W. (eds) (1997) Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity. London: Sage. Chapters 6 and 7.
Diamond, P. (2013) ‘The Progressive Dilemmas of British Social Democracy: Political Economy after New Labour’. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 15:1, 89-106.
van Elteren, M. (2009) ‘Neoliberalization and Transnational Capitalism in the American Mold’. Journal of American Studies, 43:2, 177-97.
Grimshaw, D. and Rubery, J. (2012) ‘The End of the UK’s Liberal Collectivist Social Model? The Implications of the Coalition Government’s Policy During the Austerity Crisis’. Cambridge Journal of

Economics, 36:1, 105-26.
Hart, J.A. (1992) Rival Capitalists: International Competitiveness in the United States, Japan, and Western Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Chapters 4 and 6.
Howell, C. (2007) ‘The British Variety of Capitalism: Institutional Change, Industrial Relations and British Politics’. British Politics, 2:2: 239-63.
Moran, M. (2006) ‘The Company of Strangers: Defending the Power of Business in Britain’, 1975-2005’. New Political Economy, 11:4, 453-77.
Moran, M. (2009) Business, Politics, and Society: An Anglo-American Comparison. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapter 7.
Schrank, A. and Whitford, J. (2009) ‘Industrial Policy in the United States: A neo-Polanyian Interpretation’. Politics & Society, 37:4, 521-53.
Scott, J. (1997) Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapters 4-5.
Suárez, S. and Kolodny, R. (2011) ‘Paving the Road to “Too Big to Fail”: Business Interests and the Politics of Deregulation in the United States’. Politics & Society, 39:1, 74-102.
Vogel, D. (1996) Kindred Strangers: The Uneasy Relationship between Politics and Business in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Chapter 8.
Vogel, S.K. (1996) Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Chapter 6.
Wilson, G.K (2003) Business and Politics: A Comparative Introduction (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Chapters 2 and 3.
4. Europe (20 February)

Presentation questions

1). Is there one Europe or several?
2). How successful has business been in shaping European integration?
3). To what extent is business power in Europe still constrained by union power?

Required reading

Carroll, W.K., Fennema, M. and Heemskerk, E.M. (2010) ‘Constituting Corporate Europe: A Study of Elite Social Organization’. Antipode, 42:4, 811-43.
Hay, C. (2004) ‘Common Trajectories, Variable Paces, Divergent Outcomes? Models of European Capitalism under Conditions of Complex Economic Interdependence’. Review of International Political

Economy 11:2, 231-62.

Further reading

van Apeldoorn, B. (2000) ‘Transnational Class Agency and European Governance: The Case of the European Round Table of Industrialists’. New Political Economy, 5:2, 157-81.
Bieler, A. (2005) ‘European Integration and the Transnational Restructuring of Social Relations: The Emergence of Labour as a Regional Actor?’ Journal of Common Market Studies, 43:3, 461-84.
Bouwen, P. (2004) ‘Exchanging Access Goods for Access: A Comparative Study of Business Lobbying in the European Union Institutions’. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42:3, 337-69.
Buch-Hansen, H. and Wigger, A. (2010) ‘Revisiting 50 Years of Market-making: The Neoliberal Transformation of European Competition Policy’. Review of International Political Economy, 17:1, 20-44.
Cermat, L. (2004) ‘The Emerging European Corporate Governance Model: Anglo-Saxon, Continental, or Still the Century of Diversity?’ Journal of European Public Policy, 11:1, 147-66.
Coates, D. (2000) Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era. Cambridge: Polity. Especially pages 64-72, 94-106.
Crouch, C. and Streeck, W. (eds) (1997) Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity. London: Sage. Chapters 2-5 (various countries).
Dølvik, J.E. and Visser, J. (2009) ‘Free Movement, Equal Treatment and Workers’ Rights: Can the European Union Solve the Trilemma of Fundamental Principles?’ Industrial Relations Journal, 40:6, 491-

509.
Hall P.A. and Soskice, D. (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Especially Chapters 6 and 10.
Heemskerk, E.M. (2013) ‘The Rise of the European Corporate Elite: Evidence from the Network of Interlocking Directorates in 2005 and 2010’. Economy and Society, 42:1, 74-101.
Horn, L. (2012) ‘Anatomy of a “Critical Friendship”: Organized Labour and the European State Formation’. Globalizations, 9:5, 577-92.
Special issue of Journal of European Public Policy (2012) ‘Changing Models of Capitalism’. 19:8. All articles are potentially of interest.
van der Pijl, K., Holman, O. and Raviv, O. (2011) ‘The Resurgence of German Capital in Europe: EU Integration and the Restructuring of Atlantic Networks and Interlocking Directorates after 1991’. Review

of International Political Economy, 18:3, 384-408.
Pontusson, J. (2005) Inequality and Prosperity: Social Europe vs. Liberal America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Pages 1-31 especially, but also throughout the book, depending on your interests.
Scharpf F.W. (2010) ‘The Asymmetry of European Integration, or Why the EU Cannot be a “Social Market Economy”’. Socio-economic Review, 8:2, 211-50.
Schmidt, V.A. (2002) The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Especially Chapters 1 and 3.
Scott, J. (1997) Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapter 6.
Thatcher, M. (2007) Internationalisation and Economic Institutions: Comparing European Experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Especially Chapter 11.
Wilson, G.K (2003) Business and Politics: A Comparative Introduction (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Chapter 5.

5. East Asia (27 February)

Presentation questions

1). To what extent is business power in East Asia organised around the ‘flying geese’ model of development?
2). The developmental state – dead or alive?
3). What was the impact of the late 1990s crisis on East Asian capitalisms?

Required reading

Carroll, T. (2012) ‘Working on, Through and Around the State: The Deep Marketisation of Development in the Asia-Pacific’. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 42:3, 378-404.
Zhang, Q and Whitley, R. (2013) ‘Changing Macro-structural Varieties of East Asian Capitalism’. Socio-economic Review, 11:2, 301-36.

Further reading

Chin, G. and Stubbs, R. (2011) ‘China, Regional Institution-building and the China-ASEAN Free Trade Area’. Review of International Political Economy, 18:3, 277-98.
Coates, D. (2000) Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era. Cambridge: Polity. Especially pages 54-64, 213-23, 234-9.
Crouch, C. and Streeck, W. (eds) (1997) Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity. London: Sage. Chapter 1.
Special section of Globalizations (2010) ‘Asian Antinomies: East Asia’s Continuing Engagement with the Global Political Economy’. 7:4. All articles are potentially of interest.
Hart, J.A. (1992) Rival Capitalists: International Competitiveness in the United States, Japan, and Western Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Chapter 2.
Hayter, R. and Edgington, D.W. (2004) ‘Flying Geese in Asia: The Impacts of Japanese MNCs as a Source of Industrial Learning’. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 95:1, 3-26.
Henderson, J. (2008) ‘China and Global Development: Towards a Global-Asian Era?’ Contemporary Politics, 14:4, 375-92.
van der Pijl, K. (2012) ‘Is the East Still Red? The Contender State and Class Struggles in China’. Globalizations, 9:4, 503-16.
Pirie, I. (2012) ‘The New Korean Political Economy: Beyond the Models of Capitalism Debate’. The Pacific Review, 25:3, 365-86.
Radice, H. (2008) ‘The Developmental State under Global Neoliberalism’. Third World Quarterly, 29:6, 1153-74.
Scott, J. (1997) Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapter 6.
Special issue of Socio-economic Review (2013) ‘Asian Capitalisms: Bringing Asia into the Comparative Capitalisms Perspective’. 11:2. All articles are potentially of interest.
Vogel, S.K. (2006) Japan Remodeled: How Government and Industry Are Reforming Japanese Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Especially Chapters 1 and 7.
Weiss, L. (1999) ‘State Power and the Asian Crisis’. New Political Economy, 4:3, 317-42.
Weiss, L. (ed.) (2003) States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Especially Chapters 10 and 12, but also Chapters 6 and 7.
Wilson, G.K (2003) Business and Politics: A Comparative Introduction (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Chapter 4.

6. Global business power (6 March)

Presentation questions

1). Is the global sphere a sphere of global business power?
2). What are the implications of the emergence of a transnational business community?
3). To what extent have we witnessed a convergence of national state policies?

Required reading

Carroll, W.K. (2010) ‘The Global Corporate Elite and the Transnational Policy-planning Network, 1996-2006: A Structural Analysis’. International Sociology, 25:4, 501-38.
Fuchs, D. (2005) ‘Commanding Heights? The Strength and Fragility of Business Power in Global Politics’. Millennium, 33:3, 771-801.

Further reading

Beder, S. (2010) ‘Business-managed Democracy: The Trade Agenda’. Critical Social Policy, 30:4, 496-518.
Special issue of Business and Politics (2007) ‘Business Power and Global Governance’. 9:3. All articles are potentially of interest, especially Bieling.
Special issue of Business and Politics (2010) ‘Private Regulation in the Global Economy’. 12:3. All articles are potentially of interest, especially Mayer/Gereffi.
Compston, H. (2013) ‘The Network of Global Corporate Control: Implications for Public Policy’. Business and Politics, 15:3, 357-79.
Farnsworth, K. and Holden, C. (2006) ‘The Business-Social Policy Nexus: Corporate Power and Corporate Inputs into Social Policy’. Journal of Social Policy, 35:3, 473-94.
Gill, S. (1998) ‘New Constitutionalism, Democratisation and Global Political Economy’. Pacifica Review, 10:1, 23-38.
Heidenreich, M. (2012) ‘The Social Embeddedness of Multinational Companies: A Literature Review’. Socio-economic Review, 10:3, 549-79.
Heires, M. (2008) ‘The International Organization for Standardization’. New Political Economy, 13:3, 357-67.
May, C. (2006) ‘The World Intellectual Property Organization’. New Political Economy, 11:3, 435-45.
Morgan, G., Whitley, R. and Moen, E. (eds) (2005) Changing Capitalisms? Internationalism, Institutional Change, and Systems of Economic Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapters 8 and

14.
Murphy, H. (forthcoming) ‘The World Bank and Core Labour Standards: Between Flexibility and Regulation’. Review of International Political Economy, Latest Articles section.
Overbeek, H., van Apeldoorn, B. and Nölke, A. (eds) (2007) The Transnational Politics of Corporate Governance Regulation. Abingdon: Routledge. Chapters 1, 8 and 11.
Quack, S. (2010) ‘Law, Expertise and Legitimacy in Transnational Economic Governance: An Introduction’. Socio-economic Review, 8:1, 3-16.
Scott, J. (1997) Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapter 8.
Weiss, L. (ed.) (2003) States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapters 1 and 14.
Wilson, G.K (2003) Business and Politics: A Comparative Introduction (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Chapter 7.
Young, K.L. (2012) ‘Transnational Regulatory Capture? An Empirical Examination of the Transnational Lobbying of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’. Review of International Political Economy,

19:4, 663-88.
7. Resisting global business power (13 March)

Presentation questions

1). How significant is the Alterglobal movement?
2). How global is the labour movement?
3). Is resistance futile?

Required reading

Evans, P. (2010) ‘Is It Labor’s Turn to Globalize? Twenty-first Century Opportunities and Strategic Responses’. Global Labor Journal, 1:3, 352-79. Available at:

http://digitalcommons.mcmaster.ca/globallabour/vol1/iss3/3.
Stephen, M. (2009) ‘Alter-globalism as Counter-hegemony: Evaluating the “Postmodern Prince”’. Globalizations, 6:4, 483-98.

Further reading

Ashman, S. (2004) ‘Resistance to Neoliberal Globalisation: A Case of Militant Particularism?’ Politics, 24:2, 143-53.
Bieler, A., Lindberg, I. & Sauerborn, W. (2010) ‘After 30 Years of Deadlock: Labour’s Possible Strategies in the New Global Order’. Globalizations, 7:1-2, 247-60.
Carroll, W.K. (2013) ‘Networks of Cognitive Praxis: Transnational Class Formation from Below?’ Globalizations, 10:5, 691-710.
Choudry, A. and Shragge, E. (2011) ‘Disciplining Dissent: NGOs and Community Organizations’. Globalizations, 8:4, 503-17.
Cutler, A.C. (2010) ‘The Legitimacy of Private Transnational Governance: Experts and the Transnational Market for Force’. Socio-economic Review, 8:1, 157-85.
Evans, P. (2008) ‘Is an Alternative Globalization Possible?’ Politics & Society, 36:2, 271-305.
Fransen, L. and Burgoon, B. (2012) ‘A Market for Workers’ Rights: Explaining Business Support for International Private Regulation’. Review of International Political Economy, 19:2, 236-66.
Fraser, N. (2005) ‘Reframing Justice in a Globalizing World’. New Left Review, 2:36, 69-88.
Gill, S. (2000) ‘Towards a Postmodern Prince? The Battle in Seattle as a Moment in the New Politics of Globalisation’. Millennium, 29:1, 131-40.
Lafferty, G. (2010) ‘In the Wake of Neo-liberalism: Deregulation, Unionism and Labour Rights’. Review of International Political Economy, 17:3, 589-608.
Pickerill, J. and Krinsky, J. (2012) ‘Why Does Occupy Matter?’ Social Movement Studies, 11:3-4, 279-87.
Radice, H. (2000) ‘Responses to Globalisation: A Critique of Progressive Nationalism’. New Political Economy, 5:1, 5-19.
Reitan, R. (2012) ‘Coalescence of the Global Peace and Justice Movements’. Globalizations, 9:3, 337-50.
Santos, B.S. (2008) ‘The World Social Forum and the Global Left’. Politics & Society, 36:2, 247-70.
Sklair, L. and Miller, D. (2010) ‘Capitalist Globalization, Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Policy’. Critical Social Policy, 30:4, 472-95.
Standing, G. (2010) ‘The International Labour Organization’. New Political Economy, 15:2, 307-18.
Toscano, E. (2012) ‘The Sphere of Action of the Alterglobal Movement: A Key of Interpretation’. Social Movement Studies, 11:1, 79-96.
Worth, O. and Buckley, K. (2009) ‘The World Social Forum: Postmodern Prince or Court Jester?’ Third World Quarterly, 30:4, 649-61.

8. Business power in times of crisis (20 March)

Presentation questions

1). What does the crisis teach us about the study of business power?
2). To what extent have we witnessed the return of the state?
3). Is the real crisis the crisis of democracy?

Required reading

Moran, M. (2009) Business, Politics, and Society: An Anglo-American Comparison. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapter 8.
Streeck, W. (2011) ‘The Crises of Democratic Capitalism’. New Left Review, 2:71, 5-29.

Further reading

van Apeldoorn, B., de Graaf, N. and Overbeek, H. (2012) ‘The Reconfiguration of the Global Capital-State Nexus’. Globalizations, 9:4, 471-86.
Biekart, K. and Fowler, A. (2013) ‘Activism 2010+: Exploring Ways and Waves’. Development and Change, 44:3, 527-46.
Bieler, A. (2012) ‘“Workers of the World, Unite?” Globalisation and the Quest for Transnational Solidarity’. Globalizations, 9:3, 365-78.
Bruff, I. (forthcoming) ‘The Rise of Authoritarian Neoliberalism’. Rethinking Marxism, Latest Articles section.
Cahill, D. (2011) ‘Beyond Neoliberalism? Crisis and the Prospects for Progressive Alternatives’. New Political Science, 33:4, 479-92.
Cerny, P.G. (1999) ‘Globalization and the Erosion of Democracy’. European Journal of Political Research, 36:1, 1-26.
Daguerre, A. (forthcoming) ‘New Corporate Elites and the Erosion of the Keynesian Fiscal Compact’. Work, Employment & Society, OnlineFirst section.
Davis, G.F. (2013) ‘After the Corporation’. Politics & Society, 41:2, 283-308.
Fraser, N. (2013) ‘A Triple Movement?’ New Left Review, 2:81, 119-32.
Gereffi, G. (forthcoming) ‘Global Value Chains in a Post-Washington Consensus World’. Review of International Political Economy, Latest Articles section.
Lane, C. and Wood, G. (2009) ‘Capitalist Diversity and Diversity within Capitalism’. Economy and Society, 38:4, 531-51.
Ryner, M. (2010) ‘An Obituary for the Third Way: The Financial Crisis and Social Democracy in Europe’. Political Quarterly, 81:4, 554-63.
Schmidt, V.A. (2009) ‘Putting the Political Back into Political Economy by Bringing the State Back in yet Again’. World Politics, 61:3, 516-46.
Schneider, B.R. (2009) ‘A Comparative Political Economy of Diversified Business Groups, or How States Organize Big Business’. Review of International Political Economy, 16:2, 178-201.
Scholl, C. and Freyberg-Inan, A. (2013) ‘Hegemony’s Dirty Tricks: Explaining Counter-globalization’s Weakness in Times of Neoliberal Crisis’. Globalizations, 10:4, 619-34.
Special issue of Third World Quarterly (2012) ‘People Power in the Era of Global Crisis’. 32:2. All articles are potentially of interest, especially Gills/Gray.
Weiss, L. (1998) The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity. Chapters 6 and 7.
Wigger, A. and Buch-Hansen, H. (forthcoming) ‘Explaining (Missing) Regulatory Paradigm Shifts: EU Competition Regulation in Times of Economic Crisis’. New Political Economy, Latest Articles section.

The scholarly apparatus of bibliography and referencing

All essays must be properly referenced. This means indicating the source of any quotation, any data, and/or for any view or interpretation which you summarise from another source or author. Failure to

attribute ideas to the source from which they have been taken constitutes plagiarism and is a serious academic offence.

As well as acknowledging the source of particular ideas or information contained in your essay, the purpose of referencing is to enable a reader to find the source that you have used. It is this principle that

guides what is to be included when you reference.

There are two alternative systems of referencing used in the social sciences, the ‘Harvard system’ (sometimes called the ‘author-date system’) and the ‘Chicago system’ (which uses footnotes). The Harvard

system is recommended (since it is easier to master), but you may use either system. Whichever system you choose you must use it consistently and you must only use one system.

In both systems of referencing you must include a list of references at the end of your essay, which gives the full bibliographical details for all the sources that you have cited, listed in alphabetical order of author

surname. This is sometimes also referred to as a bibliography. The final list of references should only include sources which you have referred to in your essay. Do not include sources you have read but not

actually cited.

The guidance below gives some general rules and examples of how to reference the most common types of source. For more detailed guidance on referencing look at one of the following websites:

Harvard: http://libweb.anglia.ac.uk/referencing/harvard.htm

Chicago: http://www.lc.unsw.edu.au/onlib/refbib.html

The formatting conventions about the order in which the various details should be given differ slightly between the Chicago and Harvard systems. Don’t worry too much about these details, as long as you

adopt a consistent system and include all the necessary information.

The Harvard system
In the Harvard system, the author and date of the source to which you are referring appears in brackets in the text of the essay/article.

Paraphrasing:
– If the author is directly discussed in the text, the brackets appear after their name. For example:
McMahan (2009) rejects many of the claims of traditional Just War Theory.

– If the author is not directly discussed in the sentence, the brackets appear after their name. For example:
Humanitarian intervention is clearly part of the responsibility to protect doctrine (Hehir 2012).

Quoting:
-The brackets appear after quote.
– If you have not mentioned the author’s name in the sentence already, this should be included too. If you have, do not include it. For example:
Mandelson invites critics of New Labour to “judge us after ten years of success in office” (1997, p. 7).
The Draft Convention uses the vague term “waging war and/or combat operations” (White 2011, pp. 137–40).

Page numbers:
– Quotes should always include the page(s) from which the quotation has been taken.
– When paraphrasing, pages should also be provided when you are drawing on a specific part of the author’s text. If the source is a single page in a text then this is indicated by ‘p. x’; if you are referring to

something which appears over a number of pages in the original source, you should give the page range as ‘pp. x-y’.

Multiple authors:
– Where there are two authors for a source, you should give both names. For example: (Clarke and Churchill 2009).
– For publications with three or more authors, you should give the first author’s surname followed by ‘et al’. For example: (Clarke et al 2007). When you list this source in the References at the end of the

essay, you should give all the authors’ names (without ‘et al’). For example: Clarke, K., Churchill, H. and Jones, P.

The full publication details for each source referred to is listed in the References section at the end of the essay.

The Chicago system
In the Chicago system, each citation is indicated by a numbered note in the text.
– A footnote at the bottom of the page gives the full bibliographical details for the source the first time it occurs. For example:
Robert Putnam argues that there has been a significant decrease in social cohesion in the United States over the past three decades, as measured by a variety of indicators.
– An abbreviated version of the bibliographical details is used for subsequent citations of the same source. This should include the author’s last name, a short title of their publication, and the page numbers.
For example:
In his proposals for how this problem should be addressed, he suggests reform of both public and private civic institutions to “invite more active participation”.

– The references must all be listed in full in alphabetical order of author in a final References section.
– Page numbers should be included as per the Harvard system.

References

The following details need to be included in the References section (for both Harvard and Chicago systems) and in the footnotes (if you are using the Chicago system):

1. Book:
Author surname, initials/first name (year of publication). Book Title (Place of Publication: Publisher).
Northedge, Andrew (2005). The Good Study Guide (Milton Keynes: Open University).

2. Chapter in edited book:
Author surname, initial (year of publication). “Chapter Title”, in initial and surname(s) of book editor(s), Book Title. (Place of publication: publisher), page range of chapter.
Wulf, H. (2006). “Reconstructing the Public Monopoly of Legitimate Force”, in A. Bryden and M. Caparini (eds), Private Actors and Security Governance (Berlin: LIT Verlag), pp. 87–106.

3. Journal article:
Author surname, initials (year of publication). “Article Title”, Journal Title, volume number (part number), page range for article.
Gamble, Andrew (2010). “The Political Consequences of the Crash”, Political Studies Review, 8 (1), pp. 3-14.

4. Newspaper article:
Author surname, initials (year of publication). “Article Title”, Newspaper Title, date of publication, page number.
Monbiot, George (2010). “General Election 2010: Grasp the Opportunity for Reform”, The Guardian, 8 May 2010, p. 17.

5. Internet source:
The same general rules apply to internet sources. You should try to give the author, year of publication, title of the publication, the web address, the date that you accessed the website (because web addresses

change, so the link may not work at later date).
Liberal Democrats (2010). Liberal Democrat Manifesto 2010. Available at http://network.libdems.org.uk/manifesto2010/libdem_manifesto_2010.pdf (accessed 23/08/2010).

6. Government publications:
Government department (year of publication). Title, Command number (for White or Green papers). Place of publication: publisher.
Department for Work and Pensions (2002). Pathways to Work: Helping People into Employment. Cm5690, London: HMSO.

Referring to sources you have not read yourself:

If you want to refer to a source but have not read the original, but only a summary written by another author (such as Weber’s ideas on democracy as summarised by Giddens), you should do it as follows:
Weber believed that the increasing democracy inevitably involved an expansion of bureaucracy (in Giddens 1993, p. 334).

Your list of references should include Giddens (1993) Sociology (which you have read), but not Weber (1978) Economy and Society (which you have not read yourself).

Common errors
– Do not divide the reference list by types of source. All sources should be in the same list ordered alphabetically.
– Do not italicise quotes (unless the original is italicised).
– Quotes over 50 words long should be indented on a new line.
– Do not number the list of references or use bullet points.
– Reference everything meticulously and ensure that you reference both empirical facts (such as statistics) and arguments.

Useful Links

Referencing
http://www.humanities.manchester.ac.uk/studyskills/develop_learner/research_skills/referencing.html