Violence against nurses and its impact on stress and productivity Custom Essay

For your final paper, you will critique the evidence-based nursing research study that you selected in Module 1, Discussion 2. This is the article on Violence against nurses and its impact on stress and

productivity.
Based on the nursing research study you chose, address all of the following in a scholarly paper consisting of 6-8 pages (not including cover page and reference page.)

Start by following the steps below:
1. Critique overview: Introduce the nursing research study you chose, provide a description of the purpose of the study, and evaluate the credibility of the researcher(s).

2. Variables: Identify the variables that are being studied, labeling them as independent or dependent.

3. Design: Identify the type of design used for the nursing research study.

4. Strengths: Identify three (3) distinct strengths of this nursing research study. Be certain they are distinct from each other, each strength must relate to a different critiquing criterion. Provide an explanation of

why they are strengths, using your knowledge of the research process and details from the research study to support your reasoning.

5. Weaknesses: Identify three (3) distinct weaknesses of this nursing research study. Be certain they are distinct from each other, each weakness must relate to a different critiquing criterion. Provide an

explanation of why they are weaknesses, using your knowledge of the research process and details from the research study to support your reasoning.

Note: Several of the criteria have multiple parts. You may use part of a single criterion such as a strength and another part of the same criterion as a weakness. However, you may not use the same criterion for

more than one strength or more than one weakness.
6. Application of Evidence-Based Practice: Discuss the importance of this research problem to nursing practice. Present a logical conclusion about whether the strengths of this study outweigh the weaknesses

in importance. Your rationale must identify which strengths or weaknesses you determine to be most important. Consider the strengths and weaknesses of the entire study. Based on your review of this nursing

research study, discuss whether or not the findings contribute to evidence guiding nursing practice.

Conclusion: This should be the final paragraph of your paper. The conclusion ties everything together by highlighting important points and statement of your opinion or decisions reached.

Reference Page: Must conform to APA guidelines. Remember that each reference listed must be cited in your paper and every citation in the paper must be listed on the reference page.

Formatting requirements:
• Font size: 12
• Font type: Times New Roman
• Double-spaced
• One inch margins
• All references cited within the paper and on the reference page must adhere to APA guidelines
• You may use the headings from this outline when writing your paper

All documents must be written and submitted in Microsoft® Word®. If written in another word processing program the instructor may not be able to open it, the formatting will be distorted and you may be

asked to resubmit your paper prior to grading.

M7A1 Graded Assignment Final Paper:
Critique a Research Study
The following criteria will be used to grade your individual assignment. The grade you receive will account for 30% of your final grade. Keep in mind that the score requirement described under each point on

the scale defines the minimum performance that must be demonstrated to achieve that score. Lesser points will be awarded if the elements of each criterion are not met or only partially met.
Grading Scale: 100-90 Points = A 89-80 Points = B 79-70 Points = C 69-60 Points = D Below 60 = F
Evaluation Criteria
Exemplary 10
Very Good 9
Good 8
Minimal 7
Rarely 6
Critique overview
1) Introduce the nursing research study you chose. 2) Provide a description of the purpose of the study. 3) Evaluate the credibility of the researcher(s).
Comprehensively addresses all elements of this criterion.
Thoroughly addresses all elements of this criterion, however, more refinement was needed.
Adequately addresses all elements of this criterion, however, one (1) element is not fully developed.
All elements of the criterion are addressed, however, two (2) elements are not fully developed.
Did not address one or more of the elements OR content is off topic
Evaluation Criteria
Exemplary 10
Very Good 9
Good 8
Minimal 7
Rarely 6
Variables and Design
1) Identify the variables being studied. 2) Label the variables as independent or dependent. 3) Identify the type of design used for the
Comprehensively addresses all elements of this criterion.
Thoroughly addresses all elements of this criterion. However, more refinement was needed.
Adequately addresses all elements of this criterion. However, one (1) element is not fully
All elements of the criterion are addressed. However, two (2) elements are not fully developed.
Did not address one or more of the elements OR content is off topic.
nursing research study. developed.
Evaluation Criteria
Exemplary 20
Very Good 18
Good 16
Minimal 14
Rarely 12
Strengths
1) Identify three distinct strengths of this nursing research study. Be certain they are distinct from each other; each strength must relate to a different critiquing criterion. 2) Provide an explanation of why they are

strengths, using your knowledge of the research process and details from the research study to support your reasoning.
Both components of the criterion are addressed in a comprehensive and thorough manner.
While both components of the criterion are addressed comprehensively, one component needed more detail.
While both components of the criterion are addressed adequately, a more thorough discussion is needed.
Although both components are present, the content is superficial or not well developed.
Did not address one or more components or was off topic.
Evaluation Criteria
Exemplary 20
Very Good 18
Good 16
Minimal 14
Rarely 12
Weaknesses
1) Identify three distinct weaknesses of this nursing research study. Be certain they are distinct from each other; each weakness must relate to a different critiquing criterion. 2) Provide an explanation of why

they are weaknesses, using your knowledge of the research process and details from the research study to support your reasoning.
Both components of the criterion are addressed in a comprehensive and thorough manner.
While both components of the criterion are addressed comprehensively, one component needed more detail.
While both components of the criterion are addressed adequately, a more thorough discussion is needed.
Although both components are present, the content is superficial or not well developed.
Did not address one or more components or was off topic.
Evaluation Criteria
Exemplary 25
Very Good 23
Good 21
Minimal 19
Rarely 17
Application of Evidenced Based Practice
1) Discuss the importance of this research problem to nursing practice. 2) Present a logical conclusion about whether the strengths of this study outweigh the weaknesses in importance. Your rationale must

identify which strengths or weaknesses you determine to be most important. 3) Consider the strengths and weaknesses of the entire study. Based on your review of this nursing research study, discuss whether

or not the findings contribute to evidence guiding nursing practice.
Program Outcome #3 Evaluates data to inform decision making in response to complex situations.
All components of the criterion are addressed in a comprehensive and thorough manner.
While all components of the criterion are addressed comprehensively, one component needed a more thorough discussion.
While all components are addressed adequately, two components require a more thorough discussion.
Although all components are present, the content is superficial or not well developed.
Did not address one or more components or was off topic.
Evaluation Criteria
Exemplary 15
Very Good 13
Good 11
Minimal 9
Rarely 7
Scholarly Writing
1) Paper is well written, organized within the paper limitation. 2) The conclusion summarizes important
The paper is exemplary and meets all four components of the criterion.
While the paper is well done and addressed all four components, one component had limitations.
While the paper is good and addressed all four criterion components,
Although the paper is acceptable and addressed all four components,
The paper did not contain one or more of the required components. points made in the body of the paper. 3) Grammar, spelling, punctuation are correct. 4) Conforms to APA standards for headings, citations

and reference page. two (2) components had limitations. three (3) components had limitations