hello there,I hope you well and fine. I want to you follow the structure that I have listed above for you and i’m going to upload the resources and Its about 20.However, please make sure you finished at time cause i need to check with my teacher before submitting this assignment its take 45% out of total subject , because last time i ordered from this sit my work wasn’t well enough and i received the re correct copy very late, but one mistake does not affect the rest that i have had ordered before and they were excellent essays.thx
————————————————————————————–
This is the assignment structure:
1500 words, +/- 10%, are expected. If there is a significant variation
to this word count, the assignment will be returned to the student
unmarked for resubmission (refer to SAM). Word count does not
include the reference list.
————————————————————————————-
Formatting requirements:
Margins
Line spacing
Font
Page numbers
Page headers
Paragraph headings
2cm
1.5 or 2 X spacing
12 point Arial or Times New Roman
Bottom right
Your name and the assignment title
Yes + subheadings in result section
—————————————————————————-
Minimum 12-15 quality references.
————————————————————————————–
SLR working tables including a copy of
your two search histories to the tutorial.
i will attached that to you i have done it wit my teacher.
—————————————————————————–
Your paper will be returned unmarked if it is:
1. The file is saved in a format other than word doc/docx
2. Assignment word count is not within designated limits i.e. +/-
10%.
—————————————————————————————
ASSIGNMENT: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.
This is that is sequential and outline the process of conducting a Systematic Literature Review. It will be your primary support resources in preparing for Assignment Systematic Literature Review.
ALL CAN BE FOUND in the attached file.
Aromataris, E & Riitano, D 2014, ‘Constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence: a guide to literature search for a systematic review’, American Journal of Nursing, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 49-56.
==================================================
This is my question.
((Indigenous health))
What strategies are effective in reducing incidents of middle ear infections in Australian Indigenous children?
==================================================
SLRs are written in a structured manner and use formal and concise writing. It is important that you follow the SLR format. You will be writing a modified version of a SLR. A template, with approximate word count, is provided below.

Background and objective(s) of the review 150 Words
• Provide a brief background about the focus of the review question.
• THEN outline what the reader can expect from your SLR
1. What is the purpose or objective(s) of the SLR?
2. What did you want to find out?
3. What evidence will you be providing to the reader and how did you establish it?
late, with approximate word count, is provided below.
—————————————————————
Background and objective(s) of the review 150 Words
• Provide a brief background about the focus of the review question.
• THEN outline what the reader can expect from your SLR
1. What is the purpose or objective(s) of the SLR?
2. What did you want to find out?
3. What evidence will you be providing to the reader and how did you establish it?
————————————————-
Search Strategy and selection criteria 300 words:
• Describe how you went about finding your information (logic grid)
1. Which databases were used to locate your articles?
2. Which subject headings and key words were used?
3. What limitations did you apply to refine your search?
4. How many articles were found initially?
5. How did you reduce the number of articles found to the number used (what was the process/decision)? For example, read titles (how many), read abstracts (how many), read full text (how many), did not meet your question criteria (how many).
• Provide a brief overview of the study designs of the selected articles used in the SLR:
1. Were the studies quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods
2. Identify the research designs – Randomised Control Trial, quasi-experiment, cohort study, etc.
3. What methods were used for data collection – questionnaire, survey, validated assessment tools etc. This process must be systematic and transparent. It means that your tutor should be able to follow your search strategy and selection criteria to locate the exact same articles that you located
.
4. Remember you only have 300 words in this section so it needs to be concise. You may wish to use a flow chart to demonstrate your process.
————————————————————————————
Main results Data synthesis and analysis 800 words:
• Use sub-headings in this section.
• Provide a synthesis of the results so that you answer the SLR question
• Start with a paragraph that describes the issue and the purpose of intervention(s) being reviewed.
• The discussion should follow the PICO method Population:
Describe the population group that was the focus of your review
Intervention: describe the intervention
Comparison intervention: what was the intervention being compared with?
Outcome: what was the outcome measure of the intervention(s)
• Summarise the main results (this will lead to the conclusion and implications)
——————————————————————————–
Conclusion and Implications for practice 250 words
• What conclusions can be drawn from the review?
• Have you answered your question confidently? Or, are the results inconclusive?
• Consider the implications or priorities for practice. This is not a personal reflection on your practice but how the outcome of your results would impact practice in general.
For example, does the information support the intervention and therefore is worthwhile to use in future practice; or is more evidence required to substantiate the benefits of its use.