Why are Professional Codes of Ethics/Conduct important Custom Essay

No attempt
Not graded
Friday, 9 May 2014, 5:00 PM
12 days 23 hours
Why are Professional Codes of Ethics/Conduct important?+
Discuss this in relation to one of the following codes: ACS, IEEE, AIS. Provide examples of how these codes might impact your approach to work.
Clarity (whole essay) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION There appears to be no organization of the essay’s contents.
0points Organization of the essay is difficult to follow due to a combination of the following: – inadequate transitions – rambling format
0.25points The essay can easily be followed. A combination of the following is apparent: – basic transitions are used. – a structured format is used.
0.5points The essay can easily be followed. A combination of the following is apparent: – effective transitions are used. – a polished format is used.
1points

Mechanical (sentence) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION Sentences and paragraphs are difficult to read and understand due to poor grammar of mechanics.
0points The essay contains numerous grammatical and mechanical errors.
0.25points The essay contains minimal grammatical or mechanical errors.
0.5points The essay is clear and concise and contains no grammatical or mechanical errors.
1points

Organisation (paragraph) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION Thoughts in the writing do not appear organized or logical. No organization visible.
0points Some thoughts are discernible, but the essay confuses the reader. It is unclear the direction the essay will take.
0.25points Most thoughts appear logically, but the essay is listless, flat or slightly muddled.
0.5points Essay presents its ideas eloquently, logically, and clearly. Writer leads the reader gracefully.
1points

Followed the Assignment Directions CONTENT The paper has no apparent relation to the directions of the assignment
0points Some of the paper follows the directions.
1points Most of the paper follows the directions.
2points The paper follows the directions precisely.
3points

Explains the topical issue CONTENT N/A
0points Names the topical issue, but hardly explains it at all.
1points Attempts to explain the topical issue but is misleading or inaccurate.
2points Explains. Topical details are accurate, but either incomplete or rambling.
2.5points Topical explanation is both concise and complete. Leads gracefully into ethical discussion.
3points

Professional Code of Ethics/Conduct identified and examined CONTENT Does not identify Professional Code of Ethics/Conduct
0points Specifies Professional Code of Ethics/Conduct but does not examine application of the Code.
1points Specifies the Professional Code of Ethics/Conduct. Attempts to explain and apply the Code but misses important points.
2points Specifies the Professional Code of Ethics/Conduct AND describes and applies them correctly. Clearly explains significance and impact.
3points

Conclusion: justified position CONTENT Doesn’t pick a position at all.
0points Picks a position but doesn’t justify it at all.
0.5points Picks and tried to justify position; but is not convincing, or gave a convincing justification that had nothing to do with the topic stated.
1points Gives a thoroughly justified position that follows logically from the topic. Even a reader who disagreed with the position before finds her/himself thinking about the issue more carefully.
1.5points

Referencing Did not include a reference list at the end of the essay
0points Included a reference list at the end of the essay
0.5points Included a reference list that generally follows the Harvard style guide with some errors.
1points Included a reference list at that consistently follows the Harvard style guide with very few or no errors.
1.5points