Rosa Parks civil rights of 1960 Custom Essay

HIS 114: Annotated Bibliography Guidelines and Rubric
Guidelines
Step 1: Read your source. Now that you have identified your final project topic and selected your sources, be sure to read them through fully before beginning your

annotations.
Step 2: Format your source in your choice of APA or Turabian style at the top of each annotation. Refer to the tools and resources from the Shapiro Library in

formatting your annotations. These tools will walk you through this process.
Step 3: Create your annotation. Creating these annotations will be critical in helping you understand the sources’ relevance and significance prior to writing your

paper. These annotations will be 2 to 3 paragraphs that sufficiently explain all four of your sources and their significance to your final paper. Refer to the grading

rubric below on how you will be assessed in this activity. You will have two annotations for your primary sources and two for your secondary sources.

Primary Sources
A primary source is a firsthand account or description of an historical event. This kind of historical resource is “unfiltered” since it has not been interpreted first

by a historian. You are acting as a historian to explain this resource.
• Authority: Identify the author, his or her place in society, and the original publication purpose (for example, is it a letter, a diary, a newspaper article?). For

what reason or purpose was it written? Who was it written for (i.e., the audience)?
• Credibility: Is the source credible? Think about its purpose as you consider the strengths, weaknesses, or biases you find when you read it.
• Relevance: How is it relevant to your final project topic? What is the connection?

Secondary Sources
Secondary sources, or second-hand accounts, are often created from the study of numerous primary sources to provide a summative interpretation or explanation of the

event, person or issue. Secondary sources, often written years or even decades after the event, can offer an historical perspective that primary documents are unable

to provide.
• Authority: Identify the author, the original publication purpose (for example, is it a newspaper article, a magazine, or some type of scholarly essay in a

professional journal?), and the audience. What is the main idea or thesis behind this source?
• Credibility: Is the source credible? Think about its purpose as you consider the strengths, weaknesses, or biases you find when you read it.
• Relevance: How is it relevant to your final project topic? What is the connection?
Rubric
Critical Elements Distinguished Proficient Emerging Not Evident Value
Authority Identifies the author, original publication purpose/main idea, and audience of all four sources with supporting details

(23-25) Identifies the author, publication purpose/main idea, and audience of all four sources with some supporting details

(20-22) Identifies the author, publication purpose/main idea, and audience of at least three sources but lacks supporting details in most of sources
(18-19) Does not identify author, publication purpose/main idea, and/or audience of most sources and lacks supporting details in most of sources
(0-17) 25
Credibility Identifies and explains all four sources’ strengths, weaknesses, and/or biases with insightful details to support explanation

(23-25) Identifies and explains all four sources’ strengths, weaknesses, and/or biases with necessary details to support explanation

(20-22) Identifies and attempts to explain four sources’ strengths, weaknesses, and/or biases but lacks details to support explanation in most of sources
(18-19) Does not identify or explain sufficient strengths, weaknesses or biases in the four sources

(0-17) 25
Relevance Describes all four sources’ relevance to paper topic with insightful details that demonstrate strong connections

(23-25) Describes all four sources’ relevance to paper topic with sufficient details to demonstrate clear connections

(20-22) Describes all four sources relevance to paper topic with some details but with gaps that require additional detail to strengthen connections
(18-19) Does not describe all four sources’ relevance to paper topic and/or lack of detail leaves connections to the topic unclear or questionable

(0-17) 25
Style and Format Annotations for all four sources are preceded by source citation in required bibliographic format in correct format

(14-15) Annotations for all four sources are preceded by source citation in required bibliographic format with at least three sources in correct format
(12-13) Annotations for all four sources are preceded by source citation in required bibliographic format with at least two sources in correct format
(11) Does not include citations in required bibliographic format for all four sources and/or does not correctly format at least two

(0-10) 15
Mechanics No errors related to grammar and organization

(9-10) Errors of grammar and organization are marginal

(8) Errors of grammar and organization are limited enough that the annotations can still be understood
(7) Errors of grammar and organization make annotations difficult to understand

(0-6) 10
Earned Total
Comments: 100

————
I need 2 primary sources and 2 secondary sources