Should the Public Policy Defence under Article V(II) include Public Shock and Conscience as a valid ground for refusing to recognise and enforce an Arbitral Award Custom Essay

Dear all,

The topic is about International Arbitration.
I would like to give you some references.

References:
Al-Fadhel, FM (2009) “Respect for Party Autonomy under Current Saudi Arbitration Law” Arab Law Quarterly 23(1)
Editor “Arbitration — Standard of Review — tenth Circuit Rejects Contractual Expansion of Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards Bowen v Amoco Pipeline Co 254 F 3d 925 (10th Cir 2001)” (2001)

Harvard Law Review 115(1267)
Editor “Dispute Over the Profits Referred to Arbitration – Arbitration Award Settling the Partnership between the Parties Rather than the Dispute over Profits – Limits of the Arbitrators Mission – Limits

Respected (Yes) – Time Period of Arbitration – Attendance of the Parties in Dispute of the Hearings held after the expiration of the Time Period – Implicit Extension Thereof (Yes) – Right to Due process –

Violation (No) Action for Annulment Rejected” (2010) Journal of Arab Arbitration 2(1)
Ginsberg, T (2010) 2The Arbitrator as Agent: Why Deferential Review is not Always Pro-Arbitration” The University of Chicago Law Review 77(1013)
Park (2005) “The Nature of Arbitral Authority: A comment in Lesotho Highlands” 21 Arb Intl 4
Stromberg, W “Avoiding the Full Court Press: International Commercial Arbitration and other Global Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes” (2007) Loyola of Los Angeles Review 40(1337)

Please do reference in OSCOLA.
Thank you very much
Best wishes,
Merlin